This book explores how political crisis talk, even false, can thread its way into the media and impact public opinion, legislation, and everyday lives. Grounded in theory and supported by data, it illustrates the powerful presence of the media in the public sphere and argues for a different approach toward the reiteration of misrepresentations and lies. Three case studies explore the strategic use of “othering” in the 21st century: The false depiction of Sharia and passage of anti-Sharia legislation in Tennessee; the anti-Muslim Congressional hearings sponsored by Rep. Peter King; and charges of Mexican criminality espoused by former President Donald Trump. A fourth case study illustrates the versatility of this mode of rhetoric through a thematic comparison of two nationalist speeches delivered years apart in vastly different settings. Findings suggest that many of the themes and tactics used in nationalist discourse remain startingly consistent. The reporting of false or overblown claims by the media often legitimized untruths, leading to additional repetition and exposure. Finally, it looks ahead, raising awareness of “othering” efforts with new minorities and the overall societal impact of demonization. For students and scholars exploring the tactics of nationalism and the power of mediatization, this book offers a dynamic, timely analysis of the effects that “othering” and false depictions have on innocent lives and the role that our most well-respected media outlets have played in the process.
This book explores how political crisis talk, even false, can thread its way into the media and impact public opinion, legislation and everyday lives.
